Is justice truly blind, or does it favor certain individuals? That’s the question on everyone’s mind after a staggering discrepancy in bail amounts has sparked outrage and debate. But here’s where it gets controversial... Former Member of Parliament for Asante Akim North, Andy Kwame Appiah-Kubi, has boldly called out what he sees as a glaring double standard in Ghana’s legal system. Speaking on TV3 on November 8, 2025, Appiah-Kubi—who also serves as the lawyer for Chairman Wontumi—questioned why Asutifi North MP Ebenezer Addo was granted bail of GH¢150,000 for alleged involvement in illegal mining activities, while Wontumi faced a whopping GH¢10 million bail for similar charges. And this is the part most people miss... Appiah-Kubi argues that if the government has set a high bail standard for illegal mining offenses, it should apply equally to everyone, regardless of political affiliation or status. He accused the government of selective enforcement, stating, 'If these are the standards they’ve set for themselves, then let the standards prevail in all situations.' This isn’t just about numbers—it’s about fairness and consistency in the fight against illegal mining, a cause that affects all Ghanaians. But is the system truly impartial, or are some getting preferential treatment? Appiah-Kubi’s comments come after the Accra High Court set Addo’s bail at GH¢150,000, despite allegations of inciting violence against soldiers and ordering the release of arrested illegal miners. Meanwhile, Wontumi, the Ashanti Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), faces far harsher conditions for comparable charges. Here’s the kicker... Appiah-Kubi challenges the public to consider whether abetment or conspiracy—both serious offenses—should carry different weights depending on who’s accused. He warns that selective prosecution undermines the very cause it claims to champion. 'When we are selectively prosecuting and selectively giving conditions, that does not help the effort,' he emphasized. So, what do you think? Is this a case of unequal justice, or are there nuances we’re missing? Let’s spark a conversation—do you agree with Appiah-Kubi’s stance, or do you see it differently? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
